Title IX Task Force Findings
Investigation - Few reported cases are formally investigated, with a large proportion of complainants declining to file a formal complaint or pursue an investigation. Further, cases against faculty are less likely to result in a reasonable cause finding than those against student and staff. Discipline - There is no faculty-governed process for disciplinary action short of termination for faculty. Further, there is inconsistency in documentation and execution of discipline for faculty and staff. For all constituents, there are no guidelines for responding to conduct that falls short of a policy violation but is nonetheless inappropriate.
Members of Investigation Subgroup
Traci Batchelder, Employee Relations Consultant, Human Resources, Deputy Title IX Coordinator for Staff; Mandy Bidinger, Executive Assistant for the Dean of Students and Title IX Project Manager; Dr. Tom Chandler, Professor and Dean of the Arnold School of Public Health; Dr. Audrey Korsgaard, Faculty Senate Chair and Professor of Management and Director, Riegel and Emory Human Resources Center; Dr. Carl Wells, Interim Director, EOP Office; Kevin Sheppard, Investigator, EOP Office.
Prioritized Action Items and Timeline for Deployment
1. Internal Communications
Action Item / Completion Goal
Develop and implement enhanced internal protocols for communications and information-sharing
between EOP and the Title IX Office and Human Resources, Provost’s Office, and Office
of Student Conduct regarding Title VI, VII and Title IX cases.
Details
This initiative is planned during the 2021-2022 academic year, in coordination with the new Title IX Office structure and reporting pathways.
2. Investigators
Action Item / Completion Goal
Benchmark Investigator Qualifications and Salary.
Details
We have obtained preliminary benchmarked data on investigator qualifications and salary
from SEC schools and other state schools in the Southeast. Further data on position
descriptions, salary ranges and human capital requirements (education, experience,
etc.) is needed. Human Resources will consult with our Classification & Compensation
Department for their input on additional benchmarking resources. This initiative is
underway in Fall 2021 as it relates to the Title IX Office structure proposal.
3. Cases that Fall Short of Policy Violations
Action Item / Completion Goal
The University will work to ensure the enhanced internal coordination of cases that
fall short of policy violations between EOP and the Title IX Office and Human Resources,
the Provost’s Office, and the Office of Student Conduct. This initiative includes
ensuring the consistent referral of applicable complaints to appropriate university
departments (HR, Provost’s Office and Office of Student Conduct) for further action
and/or disciplinary review.
Details
This initiative will also require the development of an external communications plan
to promote the awareness of available resources for reporting conduct concerns that
fall short of policy violations. This effort will be initiated in Fall of 2021. The Continuum of Care Case Management Team meetings (outlined in Investigation 7,
below), established during the Spring of 2021 have already assisted in facilitating
communication and the coordination of information between relevant campus partners.
4. Investigation Protocols
Action Item / Completion Goal
Develop revised plans for investigation protocols with guidance of subject matter
experts.
Details
EOP and the Title IX Office will develop revised plans for investigation protocols
for Title VI, Title VII and Title IX cases with the guidance of subject matter experts.
The university will also develop and seek out further offerings for training on investigation
protocols and legal developments by subject matter experts. This initiative will start
in the Fall of 2021. In preparation for this, on July 14th 2021, Cozen O'Connor delivered an all-day
training for our Title IX Implementers, including all EOP investigators, that included
a lengthy section regarding investigations.
5. Serial Microaggressions
Action Item / Completion Goal
Review and enhance internal strategies/procedures for addressing serial microaggressions
from faculty and staff.
Details
Human Resources will work with the Office of Professional Development to develop training
and other resources for supervisors to help them better address microaggressions/toxic
work environment concerns among employees. This initiative will start during the 2021-2022 academic year.
6. Non-Protected Class Anti-Bullying and Harassment Policy
Action Item / Completion Goal
Develop a non-protected class anti-bullying and harassment policy for all employees
and develop a communications rollout plan for new policy.
Details
Currently, the university has a Faculty Workplace Bullying policy (ACAF 1.80), but
no similar policy exists for staff. Per the recommendation we will seek to replace
ACAF 1.80 by developing a non-protected class anti-bullying and harassment policy
that applies to all employees with a communications rollout plan for the new policy
and available resources for concerns. This initiative will begin in Human Resources
in the 2021-2022 academic year.
7. Case Review
Action Item / Completion Goal
Add two additional case review groups.
Details
In April of 2021, the interim Title IX Coordinator organized two IPV Continuum of
Care Case Management Teams (IPV COC-CMT), each of which meets weekly to discuss on-going
cases and facilitate communication between staff involved in the response to reports,
case management and supportive services. The teams are separated into cases involving
student respondents and faculty/staff respondent. Chaired by the Title IX Coordinator,
membership includes Law Enforcement, SAVIP, EOP investigators and directors, Live
Hearings Coordinator, and corresponding Deputy Title IX Coordinators. For student
cases, membership also includes university housing, undergraduate ombuds, and the
chair of our student respondent resource committee.
In addition to the IPV COC-CMT, two additional groups were proposed by the former President, but not implemented due to the change in administration. The Interim President or new President should evaluate the utility and need for these groups:
- Discrimination & Harassment Presidential Briefing Group: Monthly presidential briefing on educational activity, expressive activity, and high-level case analysis for all harassment and discrimination matters on campus.
- Discrimination and Harassment Peer Review Committee: Small group that meets bi-weekly to review university discrimination and harassment cases with the charge of providing peer review of completeness and validity of investigations; scope includes gender-based discrimination and harassment (Title IX) as well as discrimination and harassment based on protected classes outside of gender (Title VI/Title VII).
8. Policies and Procedures
Action Item / Completion Goal
Develop an ongoing review group to analyze system level efforts to comply with policies
and procedures related to discrimination and sexual and gender-based harassment, interpersonal
violence and sexual assault and the University’s responsibilities under state and
federal law, including Title IX and its implementing regulations.
Details
This review group is recommended to include the Title IX Coordinator, EOP Director,
representatives from Cozen O’Connor and the Office of General Counsel. The group would
be tasked with analyzing trends and identifying internal and external subject matter
experts to guide the development of policies, procedures, and future training needs.
This initiative will be launched by the new office of the Title IX Director after
office is put in place.
9. Non-Protected Class Anti-Bullying and Harassment - Review and Resolution of Concerns
Action Item / Completion Goal
Develop an ongoing review group to analyze system-level efforts to comply with non-protected
class anti-bullying and harassment initiatives.
Details
Within the finalized office structure for the Title IX/EOP offices, assign specific
responsibilities for addressing and/or forwarding non-protected class anti-bullying
and harassment concerns to HR, Provost, or Office of Student Conduct for appropriate
resolution through student and employee codes of conduct. Assigned responsibilities
would include liaising with the Council of Academic Diversity Officers and the Faculty
and Staff Senates for education and prevention efforts regarding anti-bullying and
harassment. This group would be tasked with reviewing policy compliance and trend
analysis, in addition to identifying internal and off-campus experts to guide the
development of policies, procedures and future training needs.